
doi: 10.25675/3.03676
Overgrazed rangelands can lead to soil degradation, yet long-term land application of organic amendments (i.e., biosolids) may play a pivotal role in improving overgrazed rangelands in terms of soil health. However, the long-term effects on soil health properties in response to Single or Repeated, low to excessive biosolids applications, on semi-arid, overgrazed grasslands have not been quantified. Using the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF), soil physical, biological, chemical, nutrient, and overall soil health indices between biosolids applications (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 21, or 30 Mg ha−1) and application time (Single: 1991, Repeated: 2002) was determined. Results showed no significant changes in soil physical and nutrient health indices. However, the chemical soil health index was greater when biosolids were applied at rates < 30 Mg ha-1 and within the Single compared to Repeated applications. The biological soil health index was positively affected by increasing biosolids application rate, was overall greater in the Repeated as compared to the Single application, and was maximized at 30 Mg ha-1. The overall soil health index was maximized at rates < 30 Mg ha-1. When all indices were combined, and considering past plant community findings at this site, overall soil health appeared optimized at a biosolids application rate of ~ 10 Mg ha-1. The use of soil health tools can help determine a targeted organic amendment application rate to overgrazed rangelands so the amendment provides maximum benefits to soils, plants, animals, and the environment.
SMAF, soil management assessment framework, soil health, biosolids
SMAF, soil management assessment framework, soil health, biosolids
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
