Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Asexual propagation of blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima Torr.)

Authors: Weglinski, Eugene, author; Hughes, Harrison G., advisor; Redente, Edward F., committee member; Orr, Greg L., committee member;

Asexual propagation of blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima Torr.)

Abstract

Mining disturbances in Canyonlands National Park occur, in part, in monotypic stands of blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima Torr.). Blackbrush does not readily reseed itself following disturbance, therefore, stem cuttings and mound layering were evaluated as methods for asexual propagation as a means of providing plants to be used in a revegetation program. Rooted cuttings were planted to evaluate their use in revegetation. Rooting of stem cuttings was evaluated using talc, 0.3% (w/v) indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 0.8% (w/v) IBA, and Rootone, a commercially available rooting hormone mixture. Treatments were applied to cuttings collected from new, one-year-old, and older wood (2+ years) at three separate dates. Propagation by stem cutting proved successful with highest rooting percentages achieved using current year's growth with application of supplemental rooting hormone. Differences between hormone treatments were insignificant. However, differences were found in comparisons between hormone treatments and a talc control. Mound layering was investigated with 20 plants at each of three sites and involved removal of all growth over 2.5 cm above ground level. Supplemental water was applied to half the plants for the duration of the study. Plants were buried to one-half of the height of new growth on a monthly basis. Plants responded to the treatment with a flush of growth but did not root. Thirty-eight cuttings rooted the prior year were planted in spring 1989 in an abandoned roadbed to evaluate field establishment. Treatments included application of supplemental water at two week intervals. Results were inconclusive.

Covers not scanned.

Country
United States
Keywords

580, Revegetation, Reclamation of land, 630, Plant propagation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities