Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ HilPub - Publikation...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://dx.doi.org/10.25528/07...
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Entwicklung einer Domänen-Ontologie für qualitative Kategoriensysteme – QualiCO

Authors: Hocker, Julian;

Entwicklung einer Domänen-Ontologie für qualitative Kategoriensysteme – QualiCO

Abstract

Coding schemas are a central part of qualitative research in methods like Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis. Therefore, coding schemas play an important role in order to make research with these methods more transparent in the sense of Open Science. This doctoral dissertation presents the ontology QualiCO, a formal description of coding schemas. As part of the development, first a requirements analysis was conducted using stakeholder analysis, participant observation, expert interviews (n=10), and analysis of previously published category systems and textbooks of Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis. Based on this, a development phase followed. In this case, a participatory design was chosen with the evaluation of paper prototypes (n=5), an evaluation of a prototype platform of the ontology (n=4) as well as the presentation of QualiCO at different workshops. At the end of the research process, the ontology was evaluated with the help of a qualitative usability test (n=20) and a metrics-oriented qualitative evaluation (n=10). As interview partners, researchers from German-speaking qualitative educational research who already had experience with the aforementioned methods were recruited. For the usability tests, researchers from Human-Centered Design at the University of Washington in Seattle were selected. Although QualiCO was developed with German-speaking educational researchers in mind, it also met the requirements of the evaluation with researchers from Human-Centered Design. It can probably be used by other research communities working with Grounded Theory or Qualitative Content Analysis. The dissertation also describes the working methods of researchers in the field of Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis and shows the following potentials for the ontology: Publication of coding schemas, validation of coding schemas, identification of inspiration for researchers, visualization of relationships between codes, usefulness of ontology in teamwork, description of coding ...

Country
Germany
Related Organizations
Keywords

830

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green