Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

La performatividad colectiva

Collective performativity
Authors: Gonzalez Sandoval, Juan Martin;

La performatividad colectiva

Abstract

Dieser Text lädt dazu ein, über die dringende Notwendigkeit nachzudenken, rebellische dekoloniale Methodologien in der anthropologischen Praxis zu implementieren, die traditionelle koloniale Rahmen herausfordern. Durch eine theoretische und methodologische Analyse stellt diese Arbeit die kollektive Performativität als epistemologische Alternative für eine wahrhaft dekoloniale ethnographische Praxis dar. Traditionelle anthropologische Methodologien perpetuieren weiterhin koloniale Strukturen, die die Formen der Wissensproduktion, Existenz und akademischen Erfahrung einschränken. Die kollektive Performativität als dekoloniale Methodologie integriert den*die Körper*in als Zentrum der Wissensproduktion, etabliert horizontale Prozesse der partizipativen Aktionsforschung und transformiert öffentliche Räume in ethnographische Forschungsfelder. Dieser Vorschlag basiert auf Konzepten wie hablando como Calibán (Espinosa-Miñoso 2006; 2018) und opacité (Glissant 1997), den Autoethnographien (Ellis et al. 2010; Adams et al. 2015), den testimonios (Delgado-Bernal et al. 2012) und der investigación acción participativa (IAP) sowie dem sentipensante (Fals Borda 1997; 2002). Die kollektive Performance, exemplifiziert in der Arbeit von futuñeras, erzeugt Autopoiesis-Prozesse, die situiertes Wissen durch die körperliche Interaktion zwischen performantxs und espectadorxs produzieren und dabei multisensorielle und multispecies Elemente integrieren. Ebenso lädt diese Methodologie zur persönlichen und kollektiven Heilung als grundlegender Teil von Ermächtigungsprozessen angesichts kolonialer Erfahrungen ein. Dies resultiert in etnografías performáticas als innovative Methode der Feldarbeit. Die kollektive Performativität stellt eine wesentliche rebellische Methodologie dar, um die Anthropologie zu dekolonisieren, die Forschung zu demokratisieren und den*die Körper*in, Geist und Emotionen als gültige wissenschaftliche Quellen zu legitimieren.

This text invites us to think about the urgent need to implement rebel decolonial methodologies in anthropological practice that challenge traditional colonial frameworks. Through theoretical and methodological analysis, this work presents collective performativity as an epistemological alternative for truly decolonial ethnographic practice. Traditional anthropological methodologies continue to perpetuate colonial structures that limit forms of knowledge production, existence, and academic experience. Collective performativity as a decolonial methodology integrates the cuerpx as the center of knowledge production, establishes horizontal processes of participatory action research, and transforms public spaces into ethnographic research fields. This proposal is grounded in concepts such as hablando como Calibán (Espinosa-Miñoso 2006; 2018) and opacité (Glissant 1997), autoethnographies (Ellis et al. 2010; Adams et al. 2015), testimonios (Delgado-Bernal et al. 2012), and investigación acción participativa (IAP) and sentipensante (Fals Borda 1997; 2002). Collective performance, exemplified in the work of futuñeras, generates autopoiesis processes that produce situated knowledge through bodily interaction between performantxs and espectadorxs, integrating multisensorial and multispecies elements. Likewise, this methodology invites to personal and collective healing as a fundamental part of empowerment processes in the face of colonial experiences. This results in etnografías performáticas as an innovative method of fieldwork. Collective performativity constitutes an essential rebel methodology for decolonizing anthropology, democratizing research, and legitimizing the cuerpx, mind, and emotions as valid scientific sources.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!