Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Single Cutter Impact Tests Investigate Deep-Well Hammer-Drilling Performance

Authors: S. Green; A. Judzis; D. Curry; A. Black; U. Prasad; J. Rogers;

Single Cutter Impact Tests Investigate Deep-Well Hammer-Drilling Performance

Abstract

Abstract The use of a percussion hammer can provide high penetration rates through hard rocks when air drilling. The work of this paper was partly sponsored by the US Department of Energy to develop hammer drilling techniques for drilling deep hard rocks, using real drilling muds. Unfortunately, development is complicated because understanding rock breakage and cuttings removal under the dynamic loading conditions of hammer drilling is difficult. Historically, empirical relations have been used to relate hammer blow energy and blow rate with drilling. This paper presents results of carefully measured single cutter impact—as well as high rate and ‘static’—rock indentation tests under high borehole pressure conditions, using real drilling muds. The results include cutter force-displacement and crater volumes for both first stress wave (initial impact) and long time (quasi static) rock indentations. From this, specific energy for rock breakage (i.e. the energy to excavate a unit volume of rock) can be calculated. The specific energy values measured in these single cutter impact tests show the rock destruction efficiency that can be achieved by impact loading. They are compared with specific energies measured during full scale hammer and rotary drilling experiments, under relatively similar conditions. For a given rock type, impact stress, cutter configuration, wellbore pressure, and mud type are shown to be critical parameters. A key observation is that most of the rock breakage occurs during the first stress-wave, and for higher impact stresses above the dynamic confined indentation strength, relatively little additional rock breakage seems to occur.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!