Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Laboratory Evaluation Of Chemical Grouts for Wellbore Stabilization

Authors: D. Li; G. Chen; G. A. Chukwu; S. L. Patil; S. Khataniar;

Laboratory Evaluation Of Chemical Grouts for Wellbore Stabilization

Abstract

Abstract Wellbore drilling in highly fractured and unstable formations has always been one of the greatest difficulties in drilling operations. Failure and collapse of wellbore wall frequently occur in the fractured zone and may ultimately obstruct any further drilling of the wellbore. A number of techniques have been proposed and tested to improve drilling conditions in the fractured and unstable formations, but a highly effective method is still lacking. For many years chemical consolidation techniques have been studied and applied for ground support in underground mine openings. Very successful results have been achieved employing the techniques to stabilize fractured zones surrounding underground openings. For these a number of highly effective chemical materials for consolidation have been developed. In order to examine the feasibility of this technology for enhancing wellbore stability, a series of laboratory experiments have been carried out in this study. These experiments included uniaxial compressive strength tests, triaxial compressive strength tests, shear bond strength tests, indirect tensile strength tests and thick wall cylinder tests. Chemical grouts Terraset B1000, Webac 4110 and others were used in these tests and their mechanical properties were assessed. The results of the experiments show that chemical grouting is likely to improve the stability of wellbore in fractured and unstable rock formations. Among the grouting materials tested, the Webac 4110 had the best performance. Its use increased the shear strength by 100-150%.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!