Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Fault Tolerant Relative Navigation Using Inertial and Relative Sensors

Authors: Gabriel Hoffmann; Dimitry Gorinevsky; Robert Mah; Claire Tomlin; Jennifer Mitchell;

Fault Tolerant Relative Navigation Using Inertial and Relative Sensors

Abstract

Many emerging applications of space, ground, marine, and air vehicles require relative automated navigation with respect to other vehicles and objects. Disturbances in the environment may cause faults in relative navigation sensors. For sensors based on cameras or laser range finders, events as common as lighting changes, glint, or obstruction by debris could potentially cause spurious responses. Relative navigation is safety critical‐fault tolerance must be addressed. We propose a fault detection, identification, and recovery architecture using multiple moving horizon estimators, each for a separate hypothesis of the fault state of the system. The hypothesis with maximum empirical likelihood is selected. Detected and identified faults are reported to the main navigation filter, which may then discard the relative navigation sensor data, and instead temporarily rely on the inertial navigation system. The guidance system may also act on the identified fault state, taking actions to recover the system to a safe state. This logic is demonstrated in simulation for the automated rendezvous and docking (AR&D) of spacecraft‐a key technology for the near future demands of the space program. The simulation results demonstrate that faulty relative sensors may seriously aect the navigation solution. The proposed fault detection scheme has demonstrated an ability to identify faults in these sensors and take them oine before they disrupt navigation and lead to mission failure.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!