
doi: 10.2514/3.8657
The use of a purging gas flow as a means of protecting the cryogenic optics in space infrared telescopes from condensible gaseous contaminants has been studied. The significance of both the purge/contaminant differential scattering cross section and the purge gas density distribution is analyzed. It is concluded that it is important to use the correct form of the differential scattering cross section as well as accurate purge gas density distributions when estimating the effectiveness of purging flows for contaminant protection. Experimental verification of the techniques that are used here to calculate purge gas density distributions are presented. Complete contaminant rejection from the interior of a telescope is unlikely, since for realistic purge gas densities most of the contaminants prevented from reaching the optical surfaces will condense on the telescope's internal optical baffling. Specific examples of contaminant shielding for two modes of purge gas injection are presented for the Orris I telescope. The effectiveness of helium and neon as purge gases is compared.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
