
doi: 10.2514/3.6676
with A = A + v(tw/p)~]-/2, and showed that when Eqs. (3) (with a = 0.0168) and (5) were used as the eddy- viscosity formulation in the solution of the boundary-layer equations, the agreement with experiment was improved. Bushnell and Morris6 made measurements in hypersonic turbulent boundary layers at low Reynolds numbers. They observed that when they calculated the eddy-viscosity distribution from their data, the variations with Reynolds number of the parameters K and a in the inner and the outer eddy-viscosity formulas were similar to those in Refs. 5 and 4. Recently Huffman and Bradshaw7 concluded, after examining a large number of experimental data, that the parameter K in Eq. (5) was a constant. As may be seen from all these studies, the question of the universality of these constants is not settled. In the present Note we attempt to settle the question by showing that the parameter a is not a universal constant, but that K is— at least according to the calculations done by the author.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
