Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Thermal performance of thermal pad contact heat exchangers

Authors: G. P. Peterson; L. S. Fletcher; David Blackler;

Thermal performance of thermal pad contact heat exchangers

Abstract

An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the effect of variations in the load configuration and the resulting pressure distribution, on the thermal contact conductance of two 12.70 x 17.78 x 2.54 cm (5x7x1 in.) aluminum 6061-T6 surfaces. Four load configurations consisting of 4 x 4, 4 x 6, 5 x 7, and 6x8 arays were evaluated. A self-contained, general-purpos e finite element program (ANSYS) and a relatively new pressure-sensitive film were used to determine the pressure distribution as a function of the total applied load. The 5x7 array was found to minimize the number of load points yet provide optimum thermal characteristics. Using this load configuration, a second set of experiments was conducted to determine the degree to which the thermal contact conductance could be enhanced through the application of selected coatings. Three coating materials were evaluated, a 2.5 /*m thick layer of indium, a molybdenum disulfide coating (Moly-Tiolub-1175) 1.25 fJLm thick, and a Teflon impregnated anodized coating (Hard-Tuf X20) 1.25 pm thick. The results indicated that the thermal contact conductance of the thermal test pads could be enhanced by a factor of almost four by adding a coating of indium approximately 2.5 /un thick on one surface. The Moly-Tiolub-1175 and Hard-Tuf X20 coatings, while providing a somewhat more durable surface than indium, resulted in reductions in the thermal contact conductance of approximately 65% and 77%, respectively.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!