
An aerodynamic design procedure that incorporates the advantages of both traditional response surface methodology (RSM) and neural networks is described. The procedure employs a strategy called parameterbased partitioning of the design space and uses a sequence of response surfaces based on both neural networks and polynomial fits to traverse the design space in search of the optimal solution. This approach results in response surfaces that have both the power of neural networks and the economy of low-order polynomials (in terms of number of simulations needed and network training requirements). Such an approach can handle design problems with many more parameters than would be possible using neural networks alone. The design procedure has been applied to the "blind" redesign of a turbine airfoil from a modern jet engine. This redesign involved the use of 15 design variables. The results obtained are closer to the target design than those obtained using an earlier method with only three design variables. The capability of the method in transforming generic shapes, such as simple curved plates, into optimal airfoils is also demonstrated.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 109 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
