Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Evaluation of Optimization Methods for Control Allocation

Authors: Marc Bodson;

Evaluation of Optimization Methods for Control Allocation

Abstract

The performanceand computational requirements ofoptimization methodsfor control allocation areevaluated. Two control allocation problems are formulated: a direct allocation method that preserves the directionality of the moment and a mixed optimization method that minimizes the error between the desired and the achieved momentsaswellasthecontroleffort.Theconstrainedoptimizationproblemsaretransformedinto linearprograms so that they can be solved using well-tried linear programming techniques such as the simplex algorithm. A variety of techniques that can be applied for the solution of the control allocation problem in order to accelerate computations are discussed. Performance and computational requirements are evaluated using aircraft models with different numbers of actuators and with different properties. In addition to the two optimization methods, three algorithms with low computational requirements are also implemented for comparison: a redistributed pseudoinverse technique, a quadratic programming algorithm, and a e xed-point method. The major conclusion is that constrained optimization can be performed with computational requirements that fall within an order of magnitude of those of simpler methods. The performance gains of optimization methods, measured in terms of the error between the desired and achieved moments, are found to be small on the average but sometimes signie cant.Avariety ofissuesthataffecttheimplementation ofthevariousalgorithmsin ae ight-controlsystem are discussed.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    537
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 0.1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 0.1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
537
Top 0.1%
Top 0.1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!