Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
AIAA Journalarrow_drop_down
AIAA Journal
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022...
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Evaluating Dynamic Stall-Onset Criteria for Mixed and Trailing-Edge Stall

Authors: Sarasija Sudharsan; Shreyas Narsipur; Anupam Sharma;

Evaluating Dynamic Stall-Onset Criteria for Mixed and Trailing-Edge Stall

Abstract

We evaluate two leading-edge-based dynamic stall-onset criteria (namely, the maximum magnitudes of the leading-edge suction parameter and the boundary enstrophy flux) for mixed and trailing-edge stall. These criteria have been shown to successfully predict the onset of leading-edge stall at Reynolds numbers of [Formula: see text], where the leading-edge suction drops abruptly. However, for mixed/trailing-edge stall, leading-edge suction tends to persist even when there is significant trailing-edge reversed flow and stall is underway, necessitating further investigation into the effectiveness of these criteria. Using wall-resolved large-eddy simulations and the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes method, we simulate one leading-edge stall and three mixed/trailing-edge stall cases at Reynolds numbers of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. We contrast the progression of flow features such as trailing-edge separation and vortex formation across different stall types and evaluate the stall-onset criteria relative to critical points in the flow. We find that the criteria nearly coincide with the instance of leading-edge suction collapse and are reached in advance of dynamic stall vortex formation and lift stall for all four cases. We conclude that the two criteria effectively signal dynamic stall onset in cases where the dynamic stall vortex plays a prominent role.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!