
Every national literature has its own distinctions and characteristics that distinguish it from other literatures, despite the convergence of some literature from each other by virtue of several factors, including political, geographical, military and historical. However, they retain their national specificity, and here we must point out an important point, which is the influence of each other by virtue of the factors we mentioned above, but this does not mean that they walk in a balanced line in the stages of their development and renewal, and this applies to Kurdish and Persian literature, but both have their national characteristics that distinguish them from the other. Kurdish literature has gone through different stages of stagnation, rise, development, and so literature. Persian has its own provisions and circumstances. Both writers felt the need for renewal, development and advancement at a sensitive stage of the history of their nation, and so Kurdish and Persian writers felt the need to do hard work for renewal and modernization.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
