
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Este artículo indaga por las relaciones entre la noción de poder y la tradición literaria en las poéticas de Ricardo Piglia y Roberto Bolaño a partir de sus lecturas críticas. Se analiza en primer lugar en qué sentido se ha estudiado este tema en ambos autores, para luego aludir a la tradición literaria como una circulación de formas en la que actúa un tipo de poder. Después se estudia la valoración crítica de figuras como Roberto Arlt y Jorge Luis Borges dentro de los ensayos de Bolaño y Piglia. Finalmente se muestra cómo estas valoraciones críticas de la tradición revelan aspectos fundamentales de la concepción literaria de los autores y de una forma literaria tradicional que ambos han retomado y desarrollado: la narratividad secuencial.This article investigates the relationship between a concept of power and the literary tradition, as it is conceived by Ricardo Piglia and Roberto Bolaño in their critical essays. We analyze in the first place in what sense this subject has already been studied regarding Bolaño and Piglia, in order to question how one can speak of literary tradition as a form of power. Then we study the critical judgment of figures such as Roberto Arlt and Jorge Luis Borges within the critical texts of Piglia and Bolaño. At the end we show how this critical approaches to the tradition point out fundamental characteristics of their idea of literature and of a literary form developed by both of them: sequential narrativity.
Borges, Artl, tradición, tradition, Literature (General), Bolaño, Piglia, PN1-6790
Borges, Artl, tradición, tradition, Literature (General), Bolaño, Piglia, PN1-6790
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
