Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Workup for eosinophilia

Authors: Canting, Guo; Bruce S, Bochner;

Workup for eosinophilia

Abstract

With automated differentials being a common part of routine blood counts, the finding of eosinophilia is a relatively frequent occurrence. The first step in elucidating the cause is to determine the absolute eosinophil count (AEC), which is calculated from multiplying the percentage of eosinophils by the total white blood cell count. Eosinophilia is defined as an AEC of >500 eosinophils/μL, whereas hypereosinophilia is defined as an AEC of ≥1500 eosinophils/μL, a separation that is useful as an initial approach to the evaluation of such patients. Peripheral blood eosinophilia is most commonly secondary to allergies but can also be caused by certain infections, medication reactions, autoimmune diseases, or other conditions. However, hypereosinophilia is rarely, if ever, explained by allergy alone and should always prompt a further workup. A meticulous approach to exploring key aspects of the medical history is recommended for assessing increased AECs because it helps to narrow the list of possible etiologies, and treatment varies, depending on the underlying diagnosis. Special attention should be paid to the onset of eosinophilia and any coincident events, such as travel or the start of new medications. Another critical part of the history is a thorough attempt to identify any possible eosinophil-associated end-organ damage, although a biopsy of suspected involved areas is often necessary for confirmation. Because the causes of an elevated AEC are broad, determining the trigger or underlying disorder becomes an important intellectual riddle that can usually be solved with careful attention to history, physical examination, and appropriate laboratory work.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Biopsy, Eosinophilia, Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, Humans, Medical History Taking

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!