
doi: 10.2495/risk100181
Natural gas as a fuel is supplied in the most populous urban areas with the risk threatening public safety managed properly. Regulatory authorities in many countries are moving away from prescriptive approaches for keeping natural gas pipelines safe. As an alternative, risk management based on a quantitative assessment is considered to improve the level of safety. This work focuses on the quantitative risk assessment for the natural gas pipelines network and introduces parameters of fatal length and cumulative fatal length. The fatal length is defined as the integrated fatality along the pipeline associated with hypothetical accidents. The cumulative fatal length is defined as the length of pipeline section in which an accident leads to N or more fatalities. These parameters can be calculated easily within a geographic information system (GIS). For a new gas pipeline that will be installed in a suburban area, the risks are estimated simply in a few hours by using this method. This quantitative risk assessment may be useful for risk management during the planning and building stages of a new pipeline, modification of the pipeline, and to lower the risk of a buried pipeline network.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
