
doi: 10.2485/jhtb.13.91
Recently, atelocollagen has been used in tissue engineering as one of the most useful scaffolds for bone formation. However, the optimal scaffold-structure for bone engineering has not been determined. Hence, we compared the honeycomb porous structure (HPS) and the interconnected porous structure (IPS) with or without KUSA/A1 cells in vivo. KUSA/A1 cells alone, HPS alone, IPS alone, KUSA/A1-HPS and KUSA/A1-IPS were implanted in the subcutaneous pockets of 4-weeks-old male SCID mice. The implants were examined radiologically and histologically 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks after implantation. Radiologically, small radiopaque islands of new bone were observed in the implant of KUSA/A1 cells alone. No radiopacity was observed with both scaffols alone. In the KUSA/A1-HPS implant, the scaffold was partially filled with radiopaque areas. In contrast, in the KUSA/A1-IPS implant, the whole scaffold was filled with a well-defined radiopaque area. Histologically, KUSA/A1 cells alone induced only small nests of new bone. HPS alone produced inflammatory reaction. A large bone was observed in implants of KUSA/A1 cells combined with both scaffolds, but the scaffold was completely filled with new bone without inflammatory reaction within a shorter period in the KUSA/A1-IPS compared to KUSA/A1-HPS implant. Our results indicated that a cotton structured scaffold plays an important role in carrying the cells, providing the precise size, shape and comfortable environment. These results have potential impact to enhance existing therapeutic strategies.
histology, bone induction, scaffold, KUSA/A1 cells, radiologic examination
histology, bone induction, scaffold, KUSA/A1 cells, radiologic examination
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
