
pmid: 1410107
The validity of the Threat Index was examined in a study of 42 students and 15 HIV + clients. When completing the Threat Index, subjects rate the self and death on 30 bipolar adjectives. A count is made of the number of times the same adjective poles are used to describe the self and death. Uses of the same poles are called matches, while uses of different poles are called splits. The Threat Index is based on the assumption that splits indicate threat. Analysis showed that neither splits nor matches were usually threatening and that neither was necessary or sufficient for the experience of threat. These results did not support the validity of the Threat Index.
Adult, Male, Attitude to Death, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Sick Role, Reproducibility of Results, Fear, Middle Aged, Self-Help Groups, Reference Values, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Female
Adult, Male, Attitude to Death, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Sick Role, Reproducibility of Results, Fear, Middle Aged, Self-Help Groups, Reference Values, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
