
Nunnally (1962) mentions three types of profile factor analyses: correlational, covariance, and raw score sums of crossproducts. When principal components factors are used, each of these profile analyses corresponds to a precisely equivalent factor analysis of variables. In particular, if variables have previously been standardized over Ss, factor analysis of raw sums of profile crossproducts yields exactly the same results as factor analysis of correlations among variables. An example is worked out in which it is shown that factor analysis of raw sums of profile crossproducts yields exactly the same factors as factor analysis of correlations between variables. It is concluded that, of the procedures considered, factor analysis of correlations between variables is generally the most useful, because findings are easiest to communicate, and because results can be used to estimate results of the other possible factor analyses.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
