
pmid: 15209290
This paper addresses two issues in the subjective measurement of density, (a) whether perceived density is influenced by the sizes and spacing of buildings and (b) whether perceived density is influenced by surface details. Two experiments were conducted. Stimuli in Exp. 1 were 9 photomontages of rows of residential buildings. Factors were (a) building surface area (at low, medium, and high levels) and (b) layout (many small buildings and small gaps to few large buildings and large gaps, in three levels). Amount of visible building surface area accounted for 63% of variance of scaled impressions of density, while layout accounted for 15% of variance. Stimuli in Exp. 2 were grey boxes with the same factors of building surface area and layout. Scaled impressions of density of buildings and boxes correlated at .95, suggesting that surface detail had a minor effect in perceived density.
Judgment, Space Perception, Photography, Visual Perception, Humans, Factor Analysis, Statistical
Judgment, Space Perception, Photography, Visual Perception, Humans, Factor Analysis, Statistical
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
