
pmid: 14085099
Twenty-four Ss were required to detect infrequently and randomly occurring visual and auditory signals under six different schedules. In four of the sessions there were 40 visual signals and, respectively, 0, 20, 40, or 80 auditory signals. In two sessions there were 20 visual signals and 20 or 60 auditory signals. Auditory signals (increments in a steady noise background) were relatively easy to detect; visual signals (double jumps of a moving clock hand) were relatively difficult to detect. Missed detections of visual signals increased with time on task for each condition. Latency of response to visual signals increased progressively for all conditions except the one with no auditory signals (control condition). Latency was least for this control condition but decreased monotonically with number of auditory signals in other conditions. Visual missed responses were intermediate in frequency for the control conditions and apparently decreased monotonically as a function of the ratio of auditory to visual signals in the other conditions. Latency was higher for conditions with more visual signals, but no such simple relationship is apparent for missed detections.
Hearing, Hearing Tests, Visual Perception, Humans, Attention
Hearing, Hearing Tests, Visual Perception, Humans, Attention
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
