
pmid: 12371764
Abstract Objective—To determine whether Haemobartonella canis and Mycoplasma haemofelis (formerly known as H felis [large form]) can be differentiated by use of comparative analysis of gene sequences. Sample Population—Blood samples obtained from 3 dogs infected with H canis and 2 cats infected with M haemofelis. Procedure—The partial 16S rDNA and ribonuclease P RNA (RNase P) genes were amplified, cloned, and sequenced in blood samples obtained from H canis-infected dogs and M haemofelis-infected cats. The DNA sequences were subjected to comparative analysis. Results—The 16S rDNA sequences of H canis and M haemofelis were nearly identical (homology of 99.3 to 99.7%). In contrast, RNase P gene sequences had a lower degree of sequence homology between the 2 organisms (94.3 to 95.5%). Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Haemobartonella canis and M haemofelis are not identical organisms. Molecular differentiation of H canis and M haemofelis is more clearly evident by use of comparative analysis of RNase P gene sequences than by comparative analysis of 16S rDNA gene sequences. (Am J Vet Res 2002;63:1385–1388)
Base Sequence, Cat Diseases, DNA, Ribosomal, Anaplasmataceae, Dogs, Mycoplasma, Ribonucleases, Species Specificity, Anaplasmataceae Infections, Cats, Animals, Mycoplasma Infections, Dog Diseases, Phylogeny
Base Sequence, Cat Diseases, DNA, Ribosomal, Anaplasmataceae, Dogs, Mycoplasma, Ribonucleases, Species Specificity, Anaplasmataceae Infections, Cats, Animals, Mycoplasma Infections, Dog Diseases, Phylogeny
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 54 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
