Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Embryo Transfer in Cattle: Nonsurgical Transfer

Authors: R F, Rowe; M R, Del Campo; J K, Critser; O J, Ginther;

Embryo Transfer in Cattle: Nonsurgical Transfer

Abstract

SUMMARY Four experiments were conducted to define reasons for failure of nonsurgical transfer of bovine embryos. Single embryos were transferred to the uterine horn ipsilateral to the corpus luteum-bearing ovary 6 to 9 days after estrus. All recipient heifers were within ± 24 hours of heat synchrony with the donors. All nonsurgical transfers were accomplished, using the Cassou apparatus with 0.5 ml French straws. Pregnancy was determined by rectal palpation on day 40 (31 to 34 days after transfer). In experiment 1, when embryos were transferred surgically, pregnancy rates were not different between the midventral approach (11/14, 77%) and the flank approach (10/14, 71%) but were lower (P < 0.05) when transfers were done nonsurgically (3/14, 36%). In experiment 2, transfer to the midportion of the uterine horn was compared with transfer to the cranial end of the uterine horn. Embryo survival in the midportion of the uterine horn tended to be higher (P < 0,06) when embryos were placed nonsurgically (15/20, 75%) than when transfer was accomplished surgically (9/20, 45%). Surgical transfer to the midportion of the uterine horn was not affected by sham nonsurgical manipulation. Pregnancy rate was not different between nonsurgical transfer to the middle portion of the uterine horn (15/20, 75%) and surgical transfer to the cranial portion (12/20, 60%). In experiment 3, pregnancy rate was not affected by digital compression to the uterine horn during withdrawal of the Cassou instrument after nonsurgical transfer. Pregnancy rates in experiment 4 were not different between the midportion of the uterine horn and the caudal portion of the uterine horn, using nonsurgical embryo transfer. An operator experienced in nonsurgical embryo transfer obtained higher pregnancy rates (23/40, 58%) than did an operator with no previous nonsurgical embryo transfer experience (14/40,35%, Ρ < 0.05). Amount of time to penetrate the cervix did not affect transfer results; however, increasing the time that the Cassou catheter remained in the uterus tended to decrease pregnancy rates (P < 0.07). It is concluded that experience in nonsurgical transfer is important in achieving acceptable success rates and that specific regional placement of the embryo in the uterine horn ipsilateral to the corpus luteum-bearing ovary is not imperative for nonsurgical transfer success.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Time Factors, Estrus, Pregnancy, Uterus, Animals, Cattle, Female, Embryo Transfer

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
19
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!