
doi: 10.2458/lymph.6179
pmid: 38896496
In 2015 the discovery of meningeal (dural) lymphatics was announced to much fanfare. The journal Science named this the second most important discovery of the year! Yet, they had actually been well described two and a quarter centuries earlier, in Italy, England and Holland. However, there was controversy about their existence because of the difficulties in studying them, also addressed two and a quarter centuries earlier. Their study had generated a very large literature and they were "textbook" knowledge. The reasons for this neglect are discussed emphasizing the current scientific milieu and the changing modes of evaluating scientists.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
