Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Agronomy Sciencearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Agronomy Science
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Agronomy Science
Article . 2019
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Wpływ poziomu nawożenia, ochrony roślin i gęstości siewu na zachwaszczenie pszenicy ozimej uprawianej w krótkotrwałej monokulturze

Authors: MARIUSZ PIEKARCZYK;

Wpływ poziomu nawożenia, ochrony roślin i gęstości siewu na zachwaszczenie pszenicy ozimej uprawianej w krótkotrwałej monokulturze

Abstract

W doświadczeniu polowym, przeprowadzonym w latach 2003–2007 w Mochełku koło Bydgoszczy, na glebie kompleksu żytniego dobrego, oceniano wpływ nawożenia (147 kg NPK·ha-1, 221 NPK·ha-1), ochrony roślin (bez ochrony roślin, herbicyd, herbicyd + fungicyd) i gęstości siewu (400 ziaren·m-2, 600 ziaren·m-2) na zachwaszczenie pszenicy ozimej odmiany Tonacja uprawianej w krótkotrwałej monokulturze. W badaniach wykazano znaczny wzrost liczby i masy chwastów w pszenicy uprawianej po sobie bez stosowania herbicydów. Zastosowanie herbicydu Huzar 05 WG (jodosulfuron metylosodowy + mefenpyr dietylu) ograniczało zachwaszczenie. Zwiększenie gęstości siewu pszenicy z 400 do 600 ziaren·m-2 spowodowało niewielkie zmniejszenie liczby i masy chwastów. W doświadczeniu nie stwierdzono istotnych zmian zachwaszczenia w zależności od poziomu nawożenia mineralnego

Keywords

Ecology, Agriculture (General), pszenica ozima, nawożenie, zachwaszczenie, QH540-549.5, ochrona roślin, gęstość siewu, S1-972

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold