<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
espanolLos objetivos de esta investigacion son dos: explorar la contribucion de la reevaluacion cognitiva sobre el bienestar y como un recurso de resistencia general que contribuye a la formacion de un sentido de coherencia fuerte (SOC), y estudiar la posible interaccion entre reevaluacion cognitiva y SOC para explicar el bienestar. 214 estudiantes universitarios completaron un cuestionario de regulacion emocional, una escala de sentido de coherencia y una escala de afectividad. Los resultados mostraron un efecto directo de reevaluacion cognitiva y SOC sobre afecto positivo, ademas de un efecto indirecto de reevaluacion cognitiva sobre afecto positivo a traves de alguna dimension del SOC. Como conclusion, aquellos estudiantes que usualmente reevaluan cognitivamente dotan de mayor significado a sus experiencias, lo que directa e indirectamente explicaria su afectividad positiva. EnglishThe aims of this study are twofold: to explore the role of cognitive reappraisal to predict wellbeing and as a Generalized Resistance Resource that constitutes a strong sense of coherence (SOC), and to study the interaction between this reappraisal and SOC to explain well-being. The sample comprised 214 college students who completed an emotional regulation questionnaire, a sense of coherence scale and an affect scale. Hierarchical regression analysis showed a direct effect of cognitive reappraisal and SOC on positive affect, and an indirect effect of reappraisal on positive affect through some SOC dimensions. In conclusion, college students who usually reappraise situations build a more meaningful reality, which directly and indirectly explains the presence of positive emotions in their lives.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |