Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Mielenterveysongelmat ja huonoksi koettu taloudellinen toimeentulo

Authors: Jukka Hintikka; Heimo Viinamäki; Leo Niskanen; Antti Tanskanen; Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen;

Mielenterveysongelmat ja huonoksi koettu taloudellinen toimeentulo

Abstract

In the study reported here, we investigated factors associated with the economic situation in 1,131 patients in psychiatric care, belonging to different diagnostic groups (schizophrenia, major affective disorders, neurotic disorders and personality disorders). Thirty-nine per cent of all patients receiving treatment for psychiatric problems perceived their economic situation to be poor. Schizophrenic patients most often (67%) perceived their economic situation to be good. Patients with personality disorders most often (49%) perceived it to be poor. On logistic regression analysis of the study population, there was an independent association explaining a poor economic situation for reasons being unemployed or on sick leave (OR 2.70, 95 % confidence interval 2.02 - 3.60), having professional education (OR 1.73, 95 % confidence interval 1.31 - 2.28), smoking (OR 2.43, 95 % confidence interval 1.84 - 3.22) or Beck Depression Inventory score (OR 1.08, 95 % confidence interval 1.06 - 1.10). Those with poor economic situation were uncertain about their future and assessed received social support to be inadequate. Care providers often considered the psychiatric care of these individuals to be problematic. There were some differences between diagnostic groups and genders concerning associations between poor economic situation and education, age and smoking. In conclusion, associations between economic situation and mental well-being could be found in this cross-sectional study of psychiatric patients. However, we need prospective follow-up studies to better understand their clinical importance.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!