
Este artigo explora as possíveis relações entre a Justiça Constitucional e o chamado "discurso de ódio" nas redes sociais. Para tanto, analisa diversas decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) que tiveram significativa repercussão regional e que abordam os limites da liberdade de expressão nas redes sociais. A ideia central deste artigo é que o ativismo pela justiça constitucional está diretamente relacionado à ausência de legislação específica sobre discurso de ódio.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
