
We revisit the pole-zero cancellation problem in adaptive pole-placement. It is well known that an on-line identified model in an adaptive pole-placement algorithm need not be controllable. Since the controller design usually requires that the model is controllable, this results in an ill defined control step. By exploiting the properties of the closed loop unfalsified models set, we derive an algorithm which does not suffer this difficulty The analysis is presented in the case that the system belongs to the model class.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
