
This article proposes a theorization on the dynamics of material power and normative power reasons in international politics to explain the East Timorese question. The article compares two decisive moments, firstly, the initial phase of the Indonesian annexation and the birth of the international question of Timor; secondly, the final phase of its resolution and the birth of the East Timor state, supported by the United Nations (UN), Portugal, and other actors. The article shows that, in 1975, the actors did not consider the normative reasons. On the contrary, from 1999 onwards, actors were socialized to consider the illegitimacy of the Indonesian annexation and to decide following international norms.
Portugal, Timor-Leste, poder, ONU
Portugal, Timor-Leste, poder, ONU
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
