Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.2...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.23865/cdf.2...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Rettferdighet som grunnpremiss for samskaping med pårørende

Authors: Rosemarie van den Breemer; Line Jenhaug;

Rettferdighet som grunnpremiss for samskaping med pårørende

Abstract

In the Norwegian welfare state, family caregivers are increasingly regarded as a vital resource, as the number of people requiring health and care services continues to grow while the working-age population remains stable. In this context, the concept of co-creation has become more prominent in policy, research, and practice. Within the framework of “public service logic” (PSL), co-creation entails that service recipients and providers integrate their resources, such as knowledge and skill, to generate value. Scholars working in the PSL framework seem to assume that co-creation is inherently democratic and fosters social justice, yet they lack a clear framework for how justice is achieved or what kind of public value co-creation requires. In this chapter, we investigate the understanding of value co-creation inherent in the PSL framework and highlight forms of injustice in the opportunity for equal co-creation relationships between family caregivers and service providers, addressing a missing normative dimension in PSL. We explore: 1) what normative considerations are essential for fair co-creation conditions between relatives and service providers; and 2) how this reflection can deepen the understanding of the relationship between public and private value creation. By means of Nancy Fraser’s theory of recognition and empirical examples from research on family caregivers of children with disabilities, we illustrate how various dimensions of structural injustice manifest in co-creation contexts. We argue that Fraser’s principles of redistribution, recognition, and representation should be central to value co-creation practice and theory, proposing justice as a guiding normative concern in the development of PSL.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid