Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.2...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.23865/cdf.2...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Evaluating Khi Thai’s Public Procurement Model for Sustainable Public Procurement

Authors: Helene Tronstad Moe; Luitzen de Boer; Marius Langseth;

Evaluating Khi Thai’s Public Procurement Model for Sustainable Public Procurement

Abstract

Offentlige anskaffelser har utviklet seg fra å være et verktøy for kostnadseffektivitet og etterlevelse til å bli en strategisk mekanisme for å fremme bærekraftige mål. Studien vurderer Khi V. Thais modell for offentlige anskaffelser (2001) i lys av moderne behov for bærekraftige offentlige anskaffelser (SPP), med utgangspunkt i Raworths (2018) konsept om et sosialt fundament og et økologisk tak, og Smidt et al. (2022) sin modell for dynamisk politisk tilpasning. Ved hjelp av en narrativ litteraturstudie og bibliometrisk analyse av artikler i Journal of Public Procurement, finner studien at Thais modell gir et strukturert rammeverk, men mangler eksplisitte mekanismer for bærekraft. Modellens fem komponenter (politikkutforming, regulering, autorisasjon, operasjon og tilbakemelding) støtter grunnleggende styring, men integrerer ikke i tilstrekkelig grad tverrfaglig samarbeid, interessentinvolvering eller fleksible reguleringer. Fire forslag til forbedringer fremmes: (1) styrke modellens kobling til det omkringliggende systemet, (2) innføre en mekanisme for reguleringsmessig tilpasning, (3) etablere en struktur for tverrfaglig samarbeid, og (4) formalisere interessentinvolvering. Disse forslagene bygger på en forståelse av offentlige anskaffelser som en åpen, kompleks og dynamisk prosess. Modellen foreslås videreutviklet ved å plassere anskaffelser innenfor en ramme definert av et sosialt fundament og et økologisk tak, som illustrert av Raworth (2018). Resultatene indikerer at Thais modell kan tjene som en nyttig grunnstruktur, men at videre utvikling er nødvendig for å møte dagens krav til bærekraftige anskaffelser.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid