Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ American Journal Of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
American Journal Of Pathology
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Genomic Biomarkers to Improve Ulcerative Colitis Neoplasia Surveillance

Authors: Mary P, Bronner; Jacintha N, O'Sullivan; Peter S, Rabinovitch; David A, Crispin; Lu, Chen; Mary J, Emond; Cyrus E, Rubin; +1 Authors

Genomic Biomarkers to Improve Ulcerative Colitis Neoplasia Surveillance

Abstract

No adequate means exist to identify the minority of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients destined to undergo neoplastic progression. Recognition of this subset would advance UC cancer surveillance by focusing the available management options onto the highest risk patients. Three different assays of genomic alterations in nondysplastic UC biopsies show promise for distinguishing patients with neoplasia (UC progressors) from those without (UC nonprogressors), including assays of telomere length, anaphase bridges, and chromosomal fluorescence in situ hybridization. Expanding the number of patients and testing of assays simultaneously in the same biopsy further validated their utility. A panel approach also improved testing outcome. A total of 14 UC progressors was readily separable from 15 UC nonprogressors and 6 normal controls. Chromosomal entropy (ie, the extent of alteration diversity) proved to be the most useful test. By receiver-operating characteristic analysis, mean chromosomal entropy in 28 patients over all four chromosomes yielded 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity for distinguishing progressors from nonprogressors with optimum choice of threshold. Moreover, separation was achieved using only nondysplastic and predominantly rectal (82.8%) biopsies that were remote from neoplasia, suggesting that full colonoscopy with extensive biopsies might be avoided for the majority of UC patients, the nonprogressors. These data further strengthen the concept that genomic biomarkers can distinguish UC progressors from nonprogressors and improve cancer surveillance in UC.

Keywords

Adult, Genetic Markers, Male, Adolescent, Colon, Infant, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, ROC Curve, Child, Preschool, Disease Progression, Humans, Colitis, Ulcerative, Female, Intestinal Mucosa, Child, Colorectal Neoplasms, Precancerous Conditions, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze