
According to the desmoglein (Dsg) compensation concept, different epidermal cleavage planes observed in pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus have been proposed to be caused by different autoantibody profiles against the desmosomal proteins Dsg 1 and Dsg 3. According to this model, Dsg 1 autoantibodies would only lead to epidermal splitting in those epidermal layers in which no Dsg 3 is present to compensate for the functional loss of Dsg 1. We provide evidence that both pemphigus foliaceus-IgG containing Dsg 1- but not Dsg 3-specific antibodies and pemphigus vulgaris-IgG with antibodies to Dsg 1 and Dsg 3 were equally effective in causing epidermal splitting in human skin and keratinocyte dissociation in vitro. These effects were present where keratinocytes expressed both Dsg 1 and Dsg 3, demonstrating that Dsg 3 does not compensate for Dsg 1 inactivation. Rather, the cleavage plane in intact human skin caused by pemphigus autoantibodies was similar to the plane of keratinocyte dissociation in response to toxin B-mediated inactivation of Rho GTPases. Because we recently demonstrated that pemphigus-IgG causes epidermal splitting by inhibition of Rho A, we propose that Rho GTPase inactivation contributes to the mechanisms accounting for the cleavage plane in pemphigus skin splitting.
Keratinocytes, rho GTP-Binding Proteins, Desmoglein 3, Desmoglein 1, Cell Line, Immunoglobulin G, Cell Adhesion, Humans, Pemphigus, Autoantibodies, Skin
Keratinocytes, rho GTP-Binding Proteins, Desmoglein 3, Desmoglein 1, Cell Line, Immunoglobulin G, Cell Adhesion, Humans, Pemphigus, Autoantibodies, Skin
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 47 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
