
pmid: 20881327
Diabetes is known to influence salivary composition and function, eventually affecting the oral cavity. We thus evaluated saliva samples for levels of glucose, amylase and total protein, and assessed salivary flow rate in diabetics and healthy non-diabetics. We also analyzed these parameters with regard to duration and type of diabetes mellitus and gender, and aimed to assess the interrelationships among the variables included in the study. A total of 120 age- and sex-matched participants were divided into 3 groups of 40 each; the uncontrolled diabetic group, the controlled diabetic group and the healthy non-diabetic group. Salivary investigations were performed using unstimulated whole saliva. Mean salivary glucose levels were found to be significantly elevated in both uncontrolled and controlled diabetics, as compared to healthy non-diabetics. There were significant decreases in mean salivary amylase levels in controlled diabetics when compared to healthy non-diabetics. Other than salivary glucose, no other parameters were found to be markedly affected in diabetes mellitus. Further research is needed to explore the clinical implications of these study results.
Adult, Blood Glucose, Male, healthy non-diabetics, Adolescent, type of diabetes, India, Young Adult, Sex Factors, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Salivary Proteins and Peptides, salivary parameters, Saliva, Aged, Models, Statistical, Middle Aged, Glucose, Case-Control Studies, Amylases, uncontrolled and controlled diabetics, Female, Secretory Rate
Adult, Blood Glucose, Male, healthy non-diabetics, Adolescent, type of diabetes, India, Young Adult, Sex Factors, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Salivary Proteins and Peptides, salivary parameters, Saliva, Aged, Models, Statistical, Middle Aged, Glucose, Case-Control Studies, Amylases, uncontrolled and controlled diabetics, Female, Secretory Rate
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 98 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
