
doi: 10.2323/jgam.59.191
pmid: 23863289
Three strains (K59(T), K60 and K70 (T)) representing two novel yeast species were isolated from the external surface of leaves of different wine grape (Vitis vinifera) plants, which were collected from the Kanchanaburi Research Station (N14°07'15.1″ E099°19'05.6″), Wang Dong Sub-district, Mueang District, Kanchanaburi Province, Thailand, by an enrichment technique. The sequences of the D1/D2 domain of the large subunit (LSU) rRNA gene of two strains (K59(T) and K60) were identical and differed from that of strain K70(T). In terms of pairwise sequence similarity of the D1/D2 domain, the closest species to the three strains was Candida asparagi but with 2.3% nucleotide substitutions for strains K59(T) and K60, and 2.1% nucleotide substitutions for strain K70(T). On the basis of morphological, biochemical, physiological and chemotaxonomic characteristics and the sequence analysis of the D1/D2 domain of the large subunit (LSU) rRNA gene, the three strains were assigned to be two novel Candida species. Two strains (K59(T) and K60) were assigned as Candida phyllophila sp. nov. (type strain K59(T)=BCC 42662(T)=NBRC 107776(T)=CBS 12671(T)). Candida vitiphila sp. nov. is proposed for strain K70(T) (=BCC 42663(T)=NBRC 107777(T)=CBS 12672(T)).
Microscopy, <i>Candida phyllophila</i> sp. nov., Molecular Sequence Data, Genes, rRNA, RNA, Fungal, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Thailand, DNA, Ribosomal, Plant Leaves, RNA, Ribosomal, <i>Candida vitiphila</i> sp. nov., Cluster Analysis, Vitis, phylloplane, DNA, Fungal, Mycological Typing Techniques, Phylogeny, Candida
Microscopy, <i>Candida phyllophila</i> sp. nov., Molecular Sequence Data, Genes, rRNA, RNA, Fungal, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Thailand, DNA, Ribosomal, Plant Leaves, RNA, Ribosomal, <i>Candida vitiphila</i> sp. nov., Cluster Analysis, Vitis, phylloplane, DNA, Fungal, Mycological Typing Techniques, Phylogeny, Candida
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
