Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Local Anesthetics for Neuraxial and Regional Techniques

Authors: Krystina Geiger; Michael J Schontz;

Local Anesthetics for Neuraxial and Regional Techniques

Abstract

Local anesthetics are used with neuraxial and regional techniques to provide pain relief, most commonly postoperatively. Each agent is a sodium-channel blocker, although each agent differs in onset of action, potency, duration of action, and safety profile. Chemical structure and lipophilicity are the main determinants of these characteristics. The agents may be used alone or in combination with an additive which alters the local anesthetic’s properties . Clinically, local anesthetics provide pain relief in a multimodal approach. This reduces opiate consumption, opiate-related adverse effects, and length of stay. Additional benefits when using neuraxial techniques include decreases in mortality, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, respiratory depression, and duration of ileus. Although there are many adverse effects, the most serious include neurologic and cardiovascular. Seizures and cardiac arrest may result from local anesthetic systemic toxicity when systemic levels are elevated or the patient is predisposed. Dose adjustment, removal, or reversal of the agent may be clinically indicated. Lipid emulsion therapy is a reversal agent which acts as a sequestering vehicle for the local anesthetic. Liposomal bupivacaine, the newest formulation of local anesthetic, may provide an increased duration of action compared with standard formulations, although more evidence is needed. This review contains 5 figures, 5 tables, and 59 references. Keywords: amide, ester, epidural, local anesthetic, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, lipid emulsion therapy, liposomal bupivacaine, peripheral nerve block

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!