
ABSTRACT Research on audit engagement partner characteristics has expanded rapidly since disclosure of audit engagement partner names was mandated in the U.S. However, there is little research on the effects of the audit engagement partner’s education. We investigate whether audit engagement partners’ educational backgrounds affect audit quality. Specifically, we investigate whether audit engagement partner attainment of graduate degrees, and in particular master’s degrees in accounting, is related to higher audit quality. We find clients audited by partners holding any graduate degree have lower probabilities of restatement, lower discretionary accruals, and lower probabilities of meeting or beating earning benchmarks than clients audited by partners without graduate degrees. We find the same results when audit partners hold master’s degrees in accounting but little evidence of higher quality audits when partners hold other graduate business degrees. Our findings can inform ongoing debates about the relative costs and benefits of the 150-hour CPA licensure requirement.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
