Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.2...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvx...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.5744/florid...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

“Great Powers” in the Pacific Islands:

A Calibrated Comparison of Spanish and Anglo-American Colonialism
Authors: James M. Bayman;

“Great Powers” in the Pacific Islands:

Abstract

The application of a comparative approach in Spanish colonial archaeology is a vital, but infrequent, enterprise that strengthens the historical anthropology of Western imperialism. This chapter compares early Spanish and Anglo-American colonialism in the Marianas and Hawaiian islands. Because these archipelagos were colonized by different Western powers, they offer archaeologists an opportunity to examine colonialism within a comparative framework. Colonialism in the two island groups was markedly different, but this study revealed the following similarities: 1) The indigenous desire for iron in both societies provided them a powerful incentive to provision Western ships, and such trade instigated their engagement with global capitalism, and 2) Western contact attenuated the spatial segregation of gendered labor, thereby altering the household economy. In each case, however, archaeology confirms that these changes were contextually nuanced and protracted.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!