This study examines some of Palladio9s reconstructions of ancient buildings and attempts to locate a modus operandi behind the anomalies and inconsistencies in his theory of architecture. Special attention is paid to Palladio9s inventive reconstruction of the terraces of the Roman theater at Verona and of the facade of the Temple of Minerva at Assisi, raising the issue of why he modified the evidence in both cases. The examination of these examples is complemented by a consideration of Palladio9s presentation of his own projects in the Quattro libri and by an analysis of his writings in order to determine how the concepts of nature and the antique became intertwined in his theory of architecture. Palladio9s theoretical approach was also bolstered by the literary and the architectural writings of his principal mentors, Giangiorgio Trissino and Daniele Barbaro, as well as Aristotle9s Poetics and Horace9s Ars Poetica. Palladio9s distinctive elaboration of the relationship between trees and columns is also reviewed in the context of his critique of Gothic architecture with reference to the Doge9s Palace in Venice and the facade of San Petronio in Bologna. Both Palladio9s writings and his graphic work point to a tendency to edit the evidence of antiquity and of his own work to conform to his theories.