
doi: 10.2307/824685
N this article, I propose to examine one aspect of quasi-contractual liability-a topic that is complicated and uncertain in most legal systems, not only in the area of governmental liability but also in the area of private law. For the purposes of a comparative study, I have chosen the legal systems in the United States, England, and France. There appear to be no established rules of quasi-contract applicable only to governmental liability in any of these countries, and the best that can be done is to attempt some examination of the rules in private law and ascertain how far they are applicable to governmental liability. There is the advantage of a few decided cases, but these are of little help because, based as they are upon the insecure principles of private law, they are necessarily insecure and uncertain. However, while an examination of the principles of private law will be necessary to our topic, they will be examined no further than is sufficient to understand the special problems of governmental liability.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
