
doi: 10.2307/778979
By now it is clear to most observers that the visibility of masses of homeless people obstructs belief in positive images of New York, constituting a crisis in the city's official representation. Dominant responses to the crisis assume two principal, often complementary, forms. They treat homelessness as an individual social problem isolated from the realm of urban politics or, as Peter Marcuse contends, "attempt to neutralize the outrage homelessness produces in those who see it."1 * I am grateful to Robert Ubell for countless conversations during which many of the ideas in this article were developed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
