
doi: 10.2307/626213
In the following pages I attempt briefly to survey the publications of 1929 and 1930 relating to Greek inscriptions, following the same general lines as in my last Bibliography. Their number and their volume will, I trust, serve alike to justify my bold venture and to explain the necessarily meagre and inadequate indication of their contents which is here presented.During the years under review epigraphical studies have suffered very serious losses in the deaths of K. J. Beloch and E. Meyer, who, though primarily historians, realised to the full the importance of epigraphical materials for the reconstruction of Greek history, of C. Michel, the compiler of the deservedly famous Recueil, of B. Leonardos, the tireless excavator of the sanctuary of Amphiaraus at Oropus, whose courtesy and helpfulness as Ephor of the Epigraphical Museum at Athens have won the gratitude and regard of numerous scholars, and of F. Halbherr, the leading authority on Cretan inscriptions and editor-elect of the Cretan volume of the Inscriptiones Graecae.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
