
THE SCIENCE of sanitary wat,er bacteriology began in 1880 when von Fritsch described Klebsie7la pneu-monia and K. rhinoscleromatis as organisms characteristic of huiman fecal contamination. A short time later Escherich identified Bacillus coli as an indicator of fecal pollution. Botth observers considered human fecees as dangerous pollution wlhile the feces of other warm-blooded animals we're not so regarded. From this origin the current "coliform group" developed to include numerous micro-organisms of diverse biochemical and serologic cha,racteristics, natural sources and habitats, as well as controversial sanitary interpretations. Investigators continued to enlarge the number of organisms classifieid within the coliform group by applying all available physical and biochemical procedures. In 1908, Bergey and Deehan (1) expandeld the classification to include, 16 groups composed of 256 types. The difficulties associated with application of so many subdivisions caused Jackson (2) to propose classification into only 16 groups based on sucrose, dulcitol, raffinose, and mannitol fermentation. A tremendous amount of information was available on the physical and biochemical characteristics of the coliform group, but the correlation between the source of the various types, such as fecal, vegetable, and soil, and these tabulated characteristics left much to be desired in sanitary interpretation.
Feces, Enterobacteriaceae, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Enterobacter, Escherichia coli, Water, Water Microbiology
Feces, Enterobacteriaceae, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Enterobacter, Escherichia coli, Water, Water Microbiology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
