
doi: 10.2307/451558
UR modern American underworld differs little in spirit from that of Greene and Dekker, of Cervantes and Aleman. It is true that the technique of rogue and officer have changed; Dekker's glossary of "canting language"-complete though it was, for Dekker spent enough of his life in jail to be thoroughly conversant with his material-has given way to a succession of argots in the latest of which, so far as I can determine, not a single one of his words has survived; the social status of the criminal (and of the accused criminal) has been remarkably altered; politics, prohibition, and the general decay of so-called morality are tending to efface any sharp line which may have existed between criminality and respectability. But despite these superficial changes, the forces which mold the language of the underworld remain much the same from one age to another.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
