Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Science Newsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Science News
Article . 1989 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Lessons and Questions Emerge from Armenian Quake

Authors: Richard Monastersky;

Lessons and Questions Emerge from Armenian Quake

Abstract

A team of U.S. engineering and earthquake experts returned from Armenia earlier this month, bringing with them some answers and important new questions about the extraordinarily destructive shocks that hit the region in early December, killing more than 24,000 people. According to their findings, this tragic event offers some unique lessons that could reduce death tolls from future earthquakes, not only in Armenia but around the globe. Although many factors, including freezing temperatures, combined to make this event particularly deadly, team members agree that building inadequacies are the principal reason why the strong, but not huge, quake killed so many people. Engineers who examined the damage and rescue workers who cut through the wreckage searching for trapped people blame both design deficiencies and flawed construction practices for the collapsed buildings. The main shock, which registered a magnitude of 6.9, struck just north of the city of Spitak on Dec. 7, at 11:41 a.m. local time. Four minutes later, a magnitude 5.8 aftershock occurred. Since then, swarms of aftershocks as large as magnitude 5.0 have continued to emanate from a zone centered around Spitak, a leveled city that formerly held about 16,000 people. The rubble of reinforced concrete in cities around Spitak testifies that many of the newer nine-story buildings in this quake-prone region could not survive the one-two punch of the main shock and strong aftershock, while some older, shorter buildings fared better. Although the Soviets had adapted their standard building designs for use in this seismic area, they "are indicating that the earthquake was bigger than they had designed for," says Loring Wyllie, a co-leader of the team and a structural engineer who specializes in seismic-resistant building designs with H.J. Degenkolb Associates in San Francisco. Wyllie says regulations for the area required that buildings be constructed to survive tremors that would register 7 or 8 points on the 12-point Soviet scale. The Dec. 7 event hit 10 points. In spite of the quake's severity, many damaged buildings did stand, and examinations of these structures will help engineers determine which kinds of buildings can best survive strong shaking, Wyllie says. Historical records reveal that significant earthquakes have long struck this section of eastern Armenia. The area's most recent large tremors occurred during the mid-1920s and registered about magnitude 6, which corresponds to ap-

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!