Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparative Physiology of Two Isolates of Entomophthora egressa

Authors: Gary B. Dunphy; Richard A. Nolan;

Comparative Physiology of Two Isolates of Entomophthora egressa

Abstract

Isolate 458 of Entomophthora egressa from larvae of the eastern hemlock looper and isolate 521 from larvae of the spruce budworm differed in colony morphology on coagulated egg yolk medium, protoplast growth rate in modified Grace's medium, regeneration sequence, effect on growth medium [pH, osmolality, individual and total ninhydrin-positive compound (NPC) levels, total protein and glucose concentration], rate of glucose uptake, protein synthesis, degree of amino acid utilization and growth response to CO2. The major NPC utilized included t.-aspartic acid, iL-glutamic acid, L-lysine, L-histidine, L-tyrosine, L-leucine, L-valine, I-glutamine, glycine, DL-serine and /3-alanine. The major endogenous protoplast NPC were L-glutamic acid, L.histidine, L-alanine, DLt.-serine and glycine with moderate levels of L.-aspartic acid, t-arginine, i.-proline, t.-glutamine, tL-asparagine and /f-alanine. As a result of the observed developmental and physiological differences, we conclude that isolates 458 and 521 are representatives of two distinct physiological races of E. egressa.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!