Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Sensitivity to X Rays of Mouse Spermatogonia That Are Committed to Differentiate and of Differentiating Spermatogonia

Authors: Yvonne van der Meer; René Huiskamp; Jan A. G. Davids; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Dirk G. de Rooij; Rene Huiskamp;

The Sensitivity to X Rays of Mouse Spermatogonia That Are Committed to Differentiate and of Differentiating Spermatogonia

Abstract

In the CBA mouse the radiosensitivity of the undifferentiated spermatogonia that are committed to differentiate was determined by counting their more developed descendants 10 days after graded doses of X rays. Decreasing D0 values were found when these differentiating spermatogonia were derived from undifferentiated spermatogonia that were located in all likelihood in chains of increasing length. In stages IX and X of the epithelial cycle the radiosensitivity of these undifferentiated spermatogonia was characterized by a D0 of 2.2 Gy. This D0 value most likely belongs to the Asingle spermatogonia that form repopulating colonies which give rise to differentiating spermatogonia within the same epithelial cycle. In stages XII/I, where a D0 of 1.0 Gy was found, the dose-response curve is likely dominated by the Apaired spermatogonia present in these stages. In stages III to VII, the Aaligned spermatogonia transforming into A1 spermatogonia determine the radiosensitivity. During this period the D0 decreased from 0.7 to 0.4 Gy. Differentiating A1 to A3 and B spermatogonia had rather similar radiosensitivities of 0.4 to 0.5 Gy.

Country
Netherlands
Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Mice, Mice, Inbred CBA, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Radiation Tolerance, Spermatogonia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    61
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
61
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!