Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparison of Binding of [ 3 H]Misonidazole and [ 14 C]Misonidazole in Multicell Spheroids

Authors: J S, Rasey; Z, Grunbaum; K, Krohn; N, Nelson; L, Chin;

Comparison of Binding of [ 3 H]Misonidazole and [ 14 C]Misonidazole in Multicell Spheroids

Abstract

Uptake of [2-ring-14C]misonidazole and [3H]misonidazole with tritium in the side chain has been compared in 1-mm EMT-6/UW spheroids using liquid scintillation counting and autoradiography. The uptake of both labeled sensitizers as a function of incubation time was virtually identical. Uptake by the spheroids exceeded levels in the medium by 11/2 to 2 hr and was well modeled as a first-order binding process, with rate constants of 0.00324 hr-1 for 3H and 0.00388 hr-1 for 14C. The similar uptake of the two versions of this sensitizer labeled in different positions suggests that the metabolic actions which allow the drug to bind in hypoxic cells do not principally involve metabolites which separate the number 2 carbon of the imidazole ring from the side chain. The pattern of silver grains in autoradiographs was similar for both labeled sensitizers, with most labeled drug bound in an intermediate zone of cells between the necrotic center and the actively proliferating rim of the spheroids. The superior resolution possible with the tritiated compound showed that both nucleus and cytoplasm in viable looking cells were labeled while pycnotic cells were not labeled.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Radiation-Sensitizing Agents, Neoplasms, Experimental, In Vitro Techniques, Tritium, Models, Biological, Oxygen, Nitroimidazoles, Animals, Carbon Radioisotopes, Misonidazole

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!